What Changed Hands
The December 14, 1988 transaction between Chicago Bulls and Phoenix Suns is easiest to evaluate by reconstructing the trade before judging the result. Chicago acquired Craig Hodges from Suns for Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), cash, producing a clear realized-value win. The list of assets identifies 4 distinct pieces: Craig Hodges, Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), and cash. Chicago Bulls received Craig Hodges, while Phoenix Suns received Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), and cash. That distinction matters because a trade can combine players, draft rights, picks, cash, or transaction mechanisms whose value is not interchangeable. The retrospective grade therefore follows what the specific assets became and how much useful basketball or asset value each side ultimately captured, rather than treating every line item as equal simply because it appeared in the same transaction.
How the Verdict Was Earned
The verdict is Bulls Win, with Chicago Bulls graded A and Phoenix Suns graded C+. The realized-value outcome is a clear Chicago win. Hodges became an elite specialist and rotation contributor on the first two championship teams. The price was modest for a player who fit the dynasty perfectly. Those findings define the direction of the evaluation. The relevant comparison is Craig Hodges for Chicago Bulls against Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), and cash for Phoenix Suns. Roster need, contract timing, competitive window, and front-office intent can help explain why a team accepted a particular return, but they do not replace the realized-value record. Based on the results, the stronger side is Chicago Bulls; the grade shows the size of that advantage without requiring every asset in the winning package to have become a major success.
The Package That Won Out
Chicago Bulls' return centered on Craig Hodges. The available evidence explains the advantage this way: The realized-value outcome is a clear Chicago win. Hodges became an elite specialist and rotation contributor on the first two championship teams. The price was modest for a player who fit the dynasty perfectly. That is the core support for the A grade. The point is not merely that Chicago Bulls received a package with a recognizable name or a particular number of pieces. It is that the assets credited to that side produced the more consequential result in the historical record. A winning package may derive most of its value from one player, one draft conversion, or one asset that later created additional leverage. Here, the trade details are strong enough to place Chicago Bulls on the favorable side of Bulls Win while keeping the evaluation tied to the exchange itself.
The Cost on the Other Side
Phoenix Suns received Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), and cash. That package still has to be evaluated on its own terms rather than dismissed because the verdict favors the other side. The grade for Phoenix Suns is C+, which measures the completed return against what Chicago Bulls obtained. A lower grade can still include a useful player, a pick, financial flexibility, or a defensible short-term objective; the issue is whether those benefits matched the value surrendered. In this case, the analysis does not place the two returns on equal footing. The gap between Chicago Bulls' A and Phoenix Suns' C+ reflects the difference in realized production, asset conversion, or durable value documented for Craig Hodges versus Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), and cash.
Final Verdict
Bulls Win. The grades are Chicago Bulls A and Phoenix Suns C+. The trade itself was: Chicago Bulls received Craig Hodges, while Phoenix Suns received Ed Nealy, 1989 second round pick (#46-Ricky Blanton), and cash. The realized-value outcome is a clear Chicago win. Hodges became an elite specialist and rotation contributor on the first two championship teams. The price was modest for a player who fit the dynasty perfectly. That evidence is enough to preserve the verdict without rewriting the trade around hindsight that is unrelated to the assets actually exchanged. The grade evaluates the completed transaction, not whether every front-office motive was unreasonable on the day of the deal. On that basis, Chicago Bulls produced the stronger realized return, and the A/C+ grade relationship captures how clearly that side finished ahead.