NBA Trade Verdict

Trail Blazers Win

Portland acquired LaMarcus Aldridge’s draft rights and a future second-round pick from Chicago for the rights to Tyrus Thomas and Viktor Khryapa.

June 28, 2006 Chicago Bulls / Portland Trail Blazers Record confidence: High

Chicago Bulls Received

Player Viktor Khryapa
Draft Rights rights to Tyrus Thomas

Portland Trail Blazers Received

Draft Rights rights to LaMarcus Aldridge
Draft Pick second round pick (2007 if pick is #53 or better, else 2008) (2007 #53-Demetris Nichols)

Trade Analysis

Portland Used the Fourth Pick to Acquire the Player It Preferred at No. 2

The Trail Blazers selected Tyrus Thomas fourth in the 2006 draft, then sent his rights and Viktor Khryapa to Chicago for the rights to second pick LaMarcus Aldridge and a future second-rounder. Portland’s maneuver was purposeful rather than passive. The club valued Aldridge’s size, scoring touch and polished half-court game, while Chicago prioritized Thomas’s explosive athleticism and defensive upside after his NCAA tournament run. Portland converted the lower selection into its preferred prospect and added another asset rather than paying a premium to move upward.

Aldridge Became the Stable Frontcourt Piece of a Volatile Era

Portland’s young core initially appeared to include Aldridge, Brandon Roy and Greg Oden. Injuries ended Roy’s prime and prevented Oden from becoming the expected franchise center, leaving Aldridge as the durable star who carried the roster between eras. He developed into a four-time All-Star with the Blazers, became one of the league’s best mid-post scorers and helped Portland return to the playoffs repeatedly. The trade’s value increased because Aldridge remained productive when the original rebuilding plan around him collapsed.

The Lillard Partnership Extended the Return Into a Second Competitive Cycle

Aldridge did not only support the Roy-era playoff teams. After Portland drafted Damian Lillard, he became the established interior scorer beside a new perimeter star. Their partnership produced consecutive playoff appearances and the 2014 first-round victory over Houston, Portland’s first series win in fourteen years. That second life matters to the grade. The acquired player adapted from young prospect to franchise centerpiece to veteran co-star, giving the Blazers useful value across several different roster constructions.

Chicago’s Bet on Thomas Was Understandable but Never Stabilized

Thomas entered the league after a spectacular NCAA tournament run in which his length, speed and shot blocking suggested a rare defensive ceiling. The Bulls already had a competitive team and believed his athleticism could raise its upside. He flashed that ability but never developed the offensive skill, decision-making or consistent role required to justify the trade. Chicago moved him to Charlotte during his fourth season for Flip Murray and Acie Law, ending the experiment without recovering a premium asset. Khryapa also provided little lasting value.

Aldridge’s Departure in Free Agency Does Not Erase Nine Productive Seasons

Aldridge left Portland for San Antonio in 2015 without generating a trade return, which prevents the outcome from being perfect in every respect. Trade grading still must account for the nine seasons before his departure: multiple All-Star selections, franchise statistical milestones and repeated playoff relevance. A front office can win an acquisition even if later contract management fails to preserve downstream value. Chicago received far less production and then moved Thomas for a modest return, so the later Aldridge exit does not meaningfully narrow the original exchange.

Chicago’s Grade Should Rise Slightly Above F Without Changing the Winner

An F implies there was no defensible evaluation or useful production. Thomas did become a rotation player, helped an athletic Bulls team and had a prospect case supported by his college performance. A D- better captures the result: understandable upside, sporadic flashes and no sustained payoff. Portland retains an A+ and the decisive verdict because Aldridge became the best player in the transaction by an enormous margin and served as a star through two separate roster cycles. The second-round pick only widens an already clear advantage.

Final Verdict

Portland wins with an A+, while Chicago moves from F to D-. Aldridge gave the Trail Blazers nine seasons, four All-Star selections and frontcourt stability through the collapse of the Roy-Oden plan and the rise of Lillard. Thomas had a coherent athletic upside case and produced some useful minutes, but he never became a dependable core player and was traded during his fourth season for a modest return. The Blazers moved from No. 4 to their preferred No. 2 prospect and added a second-round asset, making this one of the strongest draft-night executions in franchise history.

For Hardcore NBA Heads

LaMarcus Aldridge Kept Portland Competitive Through Two Different Rebuilds

The Aldridge trade was valuable not only because Portland selected the better player. It gave the franchise continuity when almost every other part of its original plan changed. Roy’s knees ended a brilliant career early. Oden’s injuries removed the expected defensive anchor. Lillard then arrived and created a new competitive identity. Aldridge remained productive through each transition, supplying scoring and credibility while the organization rebuilt around him more than once. Chicago’s athletic gamble never developed comparable stability.

Thomas’s Tournament Run Shaped Chicago’s Upside Bet

Thomas had overwhelmed college opponents with quickness, rebounding and rim protection during LSU’s Final Four run. His defensive plays against Texas, including Aldridge, strengthened the argument that he possessed the draft’s highest physical ceiling. Chicago wanted more length and athleticism for a young playoff roster, so the attraction was understandable. The weakness in the evaluation was assuming those tools would translate into a reliable offensive role and consistent professional decision-making. Portland preferred the player whose scoring foundation and size offered a clearer developmental path.

Aldridge’s Mid-Post Game Became Portland’s Offensive Floor

Aldridge developed a dependable turnaround jumper, face-up game and pick-and-pop range that allowed Portland to create offense even when guard play changed around him. He could punish smaller defenders without requiring constant double teams and space the floor far enough to open lanes for Roy or Lillard. That style was not always spectacular, but it gave the team a repeatable half-court option across regular seasons and playoff series. His reliability became especially important after injuries removed the more dynamic pieces of the original young core.

The Roy and Oden Injuries Increased the Trade’s Importance

Portland’s 2006-07 rebuilding sequence is often remembered for the promise of three young stars. When Roy and Oden could no longer remain healthy, the franchise could easily have fallen into another complete reset. Aldridge prevented that collapse. He became the first option, made All-Star teams and kept Portland respectable until Lillard arrived. The trade therefore provided insurance no one could have anticipated on draft night. The acquired player was durable and versatile enough to preserve organizational relevance after the surrounding plan failed.

The Lillard Era Showed Aldridge Could Share a New Hierarchy

Lillard immediately assumed major ball-handling responsibility, but Aldridge did not become obsolete. His interior scoring gave the young guard a proven partner, and their contrasting strengths forced defenses to cover multiple areas of the floor. Portland won 54 games in 2013-14 and advanced after Lillard’s iconic shot against Houston. Aldridge had scored 46 and 43 points in the first two games of that series, demonstrating that the veteran remained central to the breakthrough. The trade’s return was still producing elite playoff value eight years later.

The Bulls Never Found a Role That Converted Thomas’s Tools

Thomas could block shots, run the floor and create occasional bursts of energy, but Chicago struggled to define whether he was a power forward, small-ball center or developmental project requiring a larger offensive opportunity. His minutes and responsibilities fluctuated, and the hoped-for skill growth never matched the physical promise. By 2010, the Bulls preferred Murray and Law for immediate depth. That return did not continue the asset chain. Portland’s side became a multi-era star; Chicago’s side ended as a short experiment and two temporary rotation players.

Final Verdict

The A+ belongs to Portland because Aldridge became the franchise’s stabilizer, not merely its leading scorer. He supported the Roy teams, carried the roster through injury-driven transition and then formed a new playoff partnership with Lillard. Chicago’s D- recognizes that Thomas was a legitimate high-upside prospect whose athleticism produced moments of value, but the Bulls never converted those tools into a lasting role or downstream asset. Portland acquired the clearly superior player, received nine seasons of star production and navigated two competitive cycles with the same draft-night return.

Research sources (7)