Start With What Changed Hands
The October 5, 1979 transaction between Cleveland Cavaliers and Los Angeles Lakers is easiest to evaluate by reconstructing the trade before judging the result. Cleveland surrendered Jim Chones for Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones), leaving the partner with a clear realized-value win. The list of assets identifies 3 distinct pieces: Dave Robisch, 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones), and Jim Chones. Cleveland Cavaliers received Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones), while Los Angeles Lakers received Jim Chones. That distinction matters because a trade can combine players, draft rights, picks, cash, or transaction mechanisms whose value is not interchangeable. The retrospective grade therefore follows what the specific assets became and how much useful basketball or asset value each side ultimately captured, rather than treating every line item as equal simply because it appeared in the same transaction.
The Case Behind the Grades
The verdict is Lakers Win, with Cleveland Cavaliers graded C and Los Angeles Lakers graded B+. The partner captured the stronger completed return. Cleveland received Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones) and sent Jim Chones. Those findings define the direction of the evaluation. The relevant comparison is Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones) for Cleveland Cavaliers against Jim Chones for Los Angeles Lakers. Roster need, contract timing, competitive window, and front-office intent can help explain why a team accepted a particular return, but they do not replace the realized-value record. Based on the results, the stronger side is Los Angeles Lakers; the grade shows the size of that advantage without requiring every asset in the winning package to have become a major success.
Why One Package Finished Ahead
Los Angeles Lakers' return centered on Jim Chones. The available evidence explains the advantage this way: The partner captured the stronger completed return. Cleveland received Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones) and sent Jim Chones. That is the core support for the B+ grade. The point is not merely that Los Angeles Lakers received a package with a recognizable name or a particular number of pieces. It is that the assets credited to that side produced the more consequential result in the historical record. A winning package may derive most of its value from one player, one draft conversion, or one asset that later created additional leverage. Here, the trade details are strong enough to place Los Angeles Lakers on the favorable side of Lakers Win while keeping the evaluation tied to the exchange itself.
What the Losing Return Still Contained
Cleveland Cavaliers received Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones). That package still has to be evaluated on its own terms rather than dismissed because the verdict favors the other side. The grade for Cleveland Cavaliers is C, which measures the completed return against what Los Angeles Lakers obtained. A lower grade can still include a useful player, a pick, financial flexibility, or a defensible short-term objective; the issue is whether those benefits matched the value surrendered. In this case, the analysis does not place the two returns on equal footing. The gap between Los Angeles Lakers' B+ and Cleveland Cavaliers' C reflects the difference in realized production, asset conversion, or durable value documented for Jim Chones versus Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones).
Final Verdict
Lakers Win. The grades are Cleveland Cavaliers C and Los Angeles Lakers B+. The trade itself was: Cleveland Cavaliers received Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones), while Los Angeles Lakers received Jim Chones. The partner captured the stronger completed return. Cleveland received Dave Robisch and 1980 third round pick (#68-Ron Jones) and sent Jim Chones. That evidence is enough to preserve the verdict without rewriting the trade around hindsight that is unrelated to the assets actually exchanged. The grade evaluates the completed transaction, not whether every front-office motive was unreasonable on the day of the deal. On that basis, Los Angeles Lakers produced the stronger realized return, and the B+/C grade relationship captures how clearly that side finished ahead.