The Deal in Completed-Value Terms
Cleveland received Spencer Hawes. Philadelphia received Earl Clark, Henry Sims and two 2014 second-round picks that became Jerami Grant and Vasilije Micic. Those are the directly tied pieces that matter for this retrospective grade; the evaluation does not need hypothetical value from assets the franchises never realized.
Why Philadelphia 76ers Hold the Better Side
Philadelphia obtained the strongest realized asset in the pick that became Jerami Grant. The 76ers also received another second-round pick and two players in the package. That evidence is more important than simply counting how many names changed hands, because the grade is meant to measure franchise value actually created by the transaction.
The Case for Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland acquired Spencer Hawes for an immediate roster need. That return had real NBA value, but it did not match the longer-term asset production of what Cleveland surrendered. Giving the other side full credit for those benefits keeps the verdict proportional instead of turning a clear edge into an exaggerated one.
Why the Grades Land at D and A+
The D/A+ split reflects the gap between a limited short-term return and premium downstream draft value. The Grant pick is especially important because it became a high-value NBA player. The letter grades therefore track both the quality of the return and the scale of the gap between the two teams, not just which side technically won.
Final Verdict
76ers Win. Cleveland Cavaliers receive D, while Philadelphia 76ers receive A+. The D/A+ split reflects the gap between a limited short-term return and premium downstream draft value. The Grant pick is especially important because it became a high-value NBA player. The grade does not require crediting Philadelphia for every later event in Grant's career. The direct fact that the incoming pick became Grant is already enough to establish a substantial value edge.