What Changed Hands
The February 20, 2014 transaction between Denver Nuggets and Houston Rockets is easiest to evaluate by reconstructing the trade before judging the result. Denver acquired Aaron Brooks from Houston Rockets for Jordan Hamilton. The list of assets identifies 2 distinct pieces: Aaron Brooks and Jordan Hamilton. Denver Nuggets received Aaron Brooks, while Houston Rockets received Jordan Hamilton. That distinction matters because a trade can combine players, draft rights, picks, cash, or transaction mechanisms whose value is not interchangeable. The retrospective grade therefore follows what the specific assets became and how much useful basketball or asset value each side ultimately captured, rather than treating every line item as equal simply because it appeared in the same transaction.
How the Verdict Was Earned
The verdict is Nuggets Win, with Denver Nuggets graded B+ and Houston Rockets graded C+. Denver clearly received the superior realized return. Denver's side was led by Aaron Brooks, while the principal outgoing value was Jordan Hamilton. The B+/C+ grades reflect the players and picks that actually materialized, with contract, age, competitive-window fit, and downstream pick conversion treated as context rather than substitutes for realized value. Those findings define the direction of the evaluation. The relevant comparison is Aaron Brooks for Denver Nuggets against Jordan Hamilton for Houston Rockets. Roster need, contract timing, competitive window, and front-office intent can help explain why a team accepted a particular return, but they do not replace the realized-value record. Based on the results, the stronger side is Denver Nuggets; the grade shows the size of that advantage without requiring every asset in the winning package to have become a major success.
The Package That Won Out
Denver Nuggets' return centered on Aaron Brooks. The available evidence explains the advantage this way: Denver clearly received the superior realized return. Denver's side was led by Aaron Brooks, while the principal outgoing value was Jordan Hamilton. The B+/C+ grades reflect the players and picks that actually materialized, with contract, age, competitive-window fit, and downstream pick conversion treated as context rather than substitutes for realized value. That is the core support for the B+ grade. The point is not merely that Denver Nuggets received a package with a recognizable name or a particular number of pieces. It is that the assets credited to that side produced the more consequential result in the historical record. A winning package may derive most of its value from one player, one draft conversion, or one asset that later created additional leverage. Here, the trade details are strong enough to place Denver Nuggets on the favorable side of Nuggets Win while keeping the evaluation tied to the exchange itself.
The Cost on the Other Side
Houston Rockets received Jordan Hamilton. That package still has to be evaluated on its own terms rather than dismissed because the verdict favors the other side. The grade for Houston Rockets is C+, which measures the completed return against what Denver Nuggets obtained. A lower grade can still include a useful player, a pick, financial flexibility, or a defensible short-term objective; the issue is whether those benefits matched the value surrendered. In this case, the analysis does not place the two returns on equal footing. The gap between Denver Nuggets' B+ and Houston Rockets' C+ reflects the difference in realized production, asset conversion, or durable value documented for Aaron Brooks versus Jordan Hamilton.
Final Verdict
Nuggets Win. The grades are Denver Nuggets B+ and Houston Rockets C+. The trade itself was: Denver Nuggets received Aaron Brooks, while Houston Rockets received Jordan Hamilton. Denver clearly received the superior realized return. Denver's side was led by Aaron Brooks, while the principal outgoing value was Jordan Hamilton. The B+/C+ grades reflect the players and picks that actually materialized, with contract, age, competitive-window fit, and downstream pick conversion treated as context rather than substitutes for realized value. That evidence is enough to preserve the verdict without rewriting the trade around hindsight that is unrelated to the assets actually exchanged. The grade evaluates the completed transaction, not whether every front-office motive was unreasonable on the day of the deal. On that basis, Denver Nuggets produced the stronger realized return, and the B+/C+ grade relationship captures how clearly that side finished ahead.