Trade Verdicts
NBA Trade Verdict

Spurs Win

San Antonio won the 2011 draft-night exchange by turning George Hill into the rights to Kawhi Leonard, Davis Bertans and Erazem Lorbek; Hill still gave Indiana several productive seasons and two conference-final runs.

June 23, 2011 Indiana Pacers / San Antonio Spurs Record confidence: High

Indiana Pacers Received

San Antonio Spurs Received

Indiana Pacers

B+

San Antonio Spurs

A+

Trade Analysis

Indiana Bought a Proven Guard for a Team Ready to Rise

The Pacers entered the 2011 draft with a young core that was beginning to look like a real Eastern Conference threat. Paul George, Roy Hibbert, Danny Granger and David West needed a steady guard who could defend, play without dominating the ball and survive difficult playoff possessions. George Hill had already filled those roles for San Antonio. Indiana was not guessing about whether he could handle NBA minutes; it was paying for a 25-year-old with postseason experience and a local connection. Hill became a starter, helped organize the offense and fit comfortably beside larger creators. That immediate certainty matters. Indiana did not throw away the rights to Kawhi Leonard for a marginal reserve. It acquired a useful two-way guard who contributed throughout the franchise’s best run of the decade and helped the Pacers reach consecutive conference finals.

Hill Helped the Pacers Reach Their Intended Competitive Window

The practical case for Indiana appears in the team results. Hill was part of the starting group that won 49 games in 2012-13, pushed Miami to seven games in the Eastern Conference Finals and returned to the same round after a 56-win season in 2013-14. He defended either guard spot, spaced the floor and allowed George or Lance Stephenson to initiate possessions without leaving the lineup short of ballhandling. His scoring was not spectacular, but his low-maintenance game matched a roster built around size and defense. Indiana later signed him to a long extension, confirming that the club viewed him as more than a temporary bridge. Those years protect the Pacers from an F or D grade. A trade can be decisively lost in hindsight while still producing a legitimate starter and meaningful playoff value for the losing side.

San Antonio Converted the Fifteenth Pick Into a Franchise Heir

San Antonio’s return changed the scale of the deal. Kawhi Leonard developed from a defense-first prospect into a Finals MVP, Defensive Player of the Year and primary scorer on elite teams. The Spurs did not merely add a good player at No. 15. They found the wing who extended the championship life of the Tim Duncan era and then became the organization’s next centerpiece. Leonard defended LeBron James in two Finals, won the 2014 Finals MVP award and grew into an All-NBA offensive engine before the relationship eventually fractured. Draft rights to Davis Bertans also delivered additional rotation value, while Erazem Lorbek remained overseas. Even allowing for San Antonio’s exceptional development system, the realized return overwhelms Hill’s very good Indiana tenure. The A-plus belongs to the club that turned one established guard into a generational two-way star and another useful NBA shooter.

Development Credit Does Not Erase the Value of Transferable Rights

The fairest defense of Indiana is that Leonard’s San Antonio career was not guaranteed to happen in Indianapolis. The Spurs supplied coaching continuity, veteran leadership and a patient development plan that helped expand his shooting and creation. That uncertainty should prevent simplistic claims that Indiana knowingly traded an eventual superstar. It should not remove Leonard from the accounting. Draft rights are transferable assets, and the player selected with those rights became one of the defining players of the era. The Pacers had sufficient scouting information to select Leonard before sending him to San Antonio, and the later outcome remains part of the asset trail. Hindsight grading asks what each side ultimately received, not whether every future award was foreseeable. Indiana deserves credit for acquiring Hill with a clear plan, but San Antonio receives the larger credit for identifying and developing the rarest asset in the exchange.

Bertans Makes the Spurs Package Deeper Than a One-Player Story

Leonard understandably dominates the history, yet Davis Bertans strengthens San Antonio’s side. The Spurs waited several years for the Latvian forward to arrive, then received three seasons of high-volume perimeter shooting before moving on. Bertans never approached Leonard’s stature, but his inclusion shows that San Antonio obtained multiple useful rights rather than winning only because one prospect beat every expectation. Lorbek did not join the NBA, and Hill remained the better immediate player on draft night. Over time, however, the Spurs transformed the package into championship production, star-level surplus value and additional rotation minutes. Indiana’s return was concentrated in one dependable guard. San Antonio’s return included the best player, the longest-lasting franchise significance and a second player who became a real NBA contributor. That depth supports a full A-plus rather than treating the exchange as a lucky single-player hit.

The Generic Partner Label Should Become an Explicit Spurs Verdict

The existing record already recognized the value gap with B-plus for Indiana and A-plus for San Antonio, but “Partner Win” hides the identity of the winning organization. The grades should remain. Indiana’s B-plus appropriately reflects four productive seasons, two conference-finals appearances and a sensible roster fit. San Antonio’s A-plus captures Leonard’s championship impact, individual honors and Bertans’ additional value. What needs correction is the verdict language. Calling this a Spurs win is more precise and more useful to a reader than preserving a generic partner label. The conclusion does not require downgrading Indiana’s process into incompetence. It simply recognizes that San Antonio received the asset that became the best player, the biggest postseason difference-maker and the most consequential long-term piece in the transaction by a wide margin.

Final Verdict

Spurs Win — Indiana B-plus, San Antonio A-plus. George Hill was a successful Pacers acquisition who started for two conference-finalists and gave a rising roster exactly the kind of steady two-way guard it needed. San Antonio nevertheless obtained Kawhi Leonard’s draft rights, developed him into a Finals MVP and perennial All-NBA star, and also received the rights to Davis Bertans. Indiana realized good value; the Spurs realized franchise-altering value. The explicit verdict should replace the generic partner label without changing either team’s grade.

For Hardcore NBA Heads

How San Antonio Turned George Hill Into the Bridge Between Championship Eras

The most revealing way to understand the 2011 deal is not as a simple story about one team missing on a draft pick. Indiana and San Antonio were solving different problems. The Pacers wanted an established guard who could help immediately as Paul George and Roy Hibbert matured. The Spurs wanted to refresh an aging contender without abandoning it. Hill was trusted, productive and popular in San Antonio, so moving him required conviction. The return provided a long, switchable wing with defensive instincts and two additional international rights. Leonard’s later greatness was not inevitable, but the structure of the wager was clear: Indiana purchased certainty while San Antonio accepted development risk in exchange for a higher ceiling. Both plans worked to some degree. Only one produced the player who could lead a championship team.

Hill Was Valuable Enough That San Antonio Had to Make a Real Choice

George Hill was not disposable. Gregg Popovich trusted him in playoff games, and his defense, length and composure made him an ideal reserve behind Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. Trading a reliable 25-year-old from a contender carried opportunity cost, especially because Leonard entered the league with questions about his shooting and half-court creation. San Antonio’s willingness to move Hill reflected confidence in both its existing guard depth and its player-development system. The Spurs could absorb the short-term loss because Parker and Ginobili still controlled the backcourt. They could also give Leonard a narrow initial role built around defense, rebounding and transition play. That organizational context allowed the club to exchange a known contributor for a prospect whose greatest strengths fit immediate needs while his weaknesses could be addressed gradually.

Indiana’s Choice Was Rational Even Though the Outcome Became Painful

The Pacers had already drafted George and did not necessarily view another developmental wing as the cleanest use of their asset. Hill offered positional clarity, playoff experience and a style that complemented the team’s emerging identity. He could guard the point of attack, make open threes and keep the offense moving without demanding star usage. Indiana then reached the conference finals twice, which means the trade supported the objective that motivated it. The mistake was not acquiring a bad player. The cost was surrendering the rights to a prospect whose eventual value exceeded almost any reasonable expectation. This distinction matters because strong retrospective grading should separate process from outcome. Indiana’s process was coherent and its return was productive. San Antonio’s scouting, patience and development converted the same exchange into one of the greatest draft-night wins in league history.

Leonard’s Role Expanded in Stages Rather Than Overnight

Leonard initially fit beside Duncan, Parker and Ginobili as a low-usage defender and rebounder. He did not need to create an offense or rescue a rebuilding team. The Spurs asked him to defend elite wings, run the floor, cut and make open shots. As his handle and jumper improved, the role widened. By the 2014 Finals he was capable of punishing Miami’s defensive attention while taking primary assignments on LeBron James. In later seasons he became San Antonio’s leading scorer and an MVP-level two-way force. That progression illustrates why the trade’s payoff belongs partly to organizational execution. The Spurs acquired the raw material, then created a development path that produced championship value before demanding superstar creation. Leonard’s rise was extraordinary, but it occurred within a structure designed to reveal each new layer at the right time.

The Deal Extended San Antonio Beyond the Original Big Three

San Antonio’s 2014 championship is the central payoff, but the deal mattered beyond one postseason. Leonard gave the Spurs a defensive successor as their veteran stars aged and later became the primary scorer on another 60-win-caliber team. Without him, the organization might still have remained competitive through Duncan’s final seasons, yet it would have lacked the younger star capable of carrying a larger offensive and defensive burden. The trade therefore linked two versions of the franchise: the veteran championship machine and the post-Duncan contender. Few draft-night moves create both immediate lineup value and a credible succession plan. The eventual rupture and 2018 trade complicate Leonard’s legacy in San Antonio, but they do not erase the years in which he helped preserve the Spurs’ place among the league’s elite.

The Best grading scale Honors Hill Without Blurring the Winner

A B-plus for Indiana avoids the lazy conclusion that every trade involving a future superstar must be an automatic failure for the other team. Hill played well, fit the roster and participated in deep playoff runs. An A-plus for San Antonio reflects a different magnitude: a Finals MVP, a championship, elite defensive seasons, MVP-level production and additional value from Bertans. Those grades can coexist because trade evaluation is not zero-sum at the level of letter grades. Both clubs can receive useful returns, while one return is still dramatically better. The verdict should name the Spurs because the identity of the winner is not ambiguous. San Antonio accepted more uncertainty, evaluated the prospect correctly and created the environment in which the highest possible outcome became real.

Final Verdict

Spurs Win. Indiana’s side deserves respect because George Hill was a real piece of a legitimate contender, not a failed acquisition. San Antonio’s side belongs in the highest tier because Kawhi Leonard became the player who extended one dynasty, won a Finals MVP and carried the organization into its next competitive phase. Davis Bertans added useful secondary value. The trade is a model of how a contender can exchange present certainty for a prospect whose defense fits immediately and whose offensive ceiling can be developed over time.

Research sources (7)