NBA Trade Verdict

Pacers Win

Indiana sent Danny Granger and a 2015 second-round pick to Philadelphia for Evan Turner and Lavoy Allen during its 2014 title push; Turner struggled to fit, but Allen supplied several seasons of reserve value.

February 20, 2014 Indiana Pacers / Philadelphia 76ers Record confidence: High

Philadelphia 76ers Received

Trade Analysis

Indiana Tried to Upgrade a Contender's Bench

The Pacers entered the 2014 deadline with championship expectations and a former All-Star, Danny Granger, who had been diminished by injuries. Philadelphia was rebuilding and willing to move Evan Turner and Lavoy Allen for Granger and a future second-round pick. Indiana's basketball logic was straightforward: exchange an expiring veteran who no longer had a major role for a younger secondary creator and a usable reserve big.

Turner's Philadelphia Production Did Not Transfer Cleanly

Turner arrived after averaging 17.4 points, 6.0 rebounds, and 3.7 assists for a poor 76ers team, but those numbers came with the ball and a starting role. Indiana needed him to fit behind Paul George and Lance Stephenson, defend consistently, and create without controlling the offense. The adjustment never settled. His efficiency remained modest, his role shrank, and he was removed from the rotation during part of the postseason.

Lavoy Allen Became the Durable Piece of Indiana's Return

Allen was treated as secondary in the initial reaction, yet he stayed with the Pacers beyond Turner's brief tenure and supplied several seasons of backup frontcourt minutes. He rebounded, defended stronger players, and accepted a limited role without requiring touches. That modest but real continuity is the strongest argument for Indiana's B. The Pacers did not acquire a difference-maker, but they did obtain more usable playing value than the headline suggested.

Philadelphia Converted the Deal Into a Pick and Flexibility

Granger never played for the 76ers. Philadelphia completed a buyout less than a week after the trade, using the transaction to clear Turner's and Allen's future considerations and add a 2015 second-round pick. That pick became Luka Mitrovic, who did not provide NBA production for Philadelphia. The Sixers achieved their rebuilding objective, but the realized return remained limited to flexibility and an asset that failed to become a rotation player.

The Chemistry Narrative Should Not Replace the Asset Review

Indiana's post-deadline decline and Turner's reported friction with Stephenson made the trade a lasting symbol of a contender losing cohesion. That context matters, but it does not prove Granger would have reversed the season. He was also limited and later contributed little in the playoffs for the Clippers. The fairest judgment separates the emotional cost of moving a respected leader from the actual on-court value exchanged.

Why Indiana Holds Only a Slight Edge

The Pacers received an unsuccessful short-term Turner experiment and a useful multi-year reserve in Allen. Philadelphia received a late second, financial flexibility, and no Granger games. Neither side created major value. Indiana's B and Philadelphia's C-plus therefore support a narrow Pacers advantage rather than an even ruling. The separation comes from Allen's retained rotation service, not from pretending Turner solved Indiana's postseason problems.

Final Verdict

Indiana earns a slight edge. Evan Turner never became the playoff upgrade the Pacers envisioned, but Lavoy Allen supplied several seasons of useful reserve minutes. Philadelphia bought out Danny Granger almost immediately and the acquired second-round pick did not become an NBA contributor for the franchise. The deal was modest and Indiana's chemistry concerns remain part of the history, yet the realized value still favors the Pacers. Grades remain Indiana B and Philadelphia C-plus; the verdict becomes Slight Pacers Edge.

For Hardcore NBA Heads

The Deadline Gamble That Became a Chemistry Referendum

The Granger-Turner deal is remembered less for star production than for what it seemed to represent. Indiana moved a respected former franchise scorer while leading the East, hoping younger talent would improve the bench. Instead, Turner struggled to fit and the Pacers' season became increasingly turbulent. Philadelphia accepted the transaction as a rebuilding maneuver, prioritizing a pick and flexibility over immediate basketball value.

Granger's Name Carried More Weight Than His 2014 Role

Granger had been central to Indiana's return to relevance, but knee and calf problems had reduced his availability and efficiency. The Pacers were not trading the player who once averaged more than 25 points per game; they were trading an expiring veteran averaging limited minutes behind a new core. That distinction explains why management believed the roster could absorb the emotional cost and gain more functional depth.

Turner's Skill Set Needed Possessions Indiana Could Not Offer

Turner could rebound, handle, and create in the middle of the floor, but he was not an efficient spot-up shooter or a natural low-usage wing. Indiana already had George, Stephenson, David West, and Roy Hibbert occupying defined offensive roles. The acquisition asked Turner to become a different type of player during a title chase. The compressed timeline exposed the mismatch before the coaching staff could build a stable role around him.

Allen Quietly Outlasted Every Headline

Allen's contribution was never glamorous, but he returned to Indiana and remained a reserve through multiple seasons. For a deadline deal involving no lasting star, that matters. He gave the Pacers frontcourt insurance, offensive rebounding, and a dependable body against physical lineups. His tenure prevents the trade from being graded solely as the failed Turner rental that dominates public memory.

Philadelphia's Process Was Coherent but Produced Little

The 76ers were not trying to win in February 2014. Moving Turner and Allen reduced future commitments and added another selection to an enormous draft inventory. Granger's buyout fit that strategy. Still, a coherent process does not guarantee a strong grade. The late second became Mitrovic and did not generate NBA value, leaving Philadelphia with limited tangible return for two players who could still occupy rotation roles.

A Small Trade Became a Symbol Because of Indiana's Collapse

The Pacers' uneven finish, Turner's reduced playoff role, and internal tension made the trade easy to blame. Basketball history often assigns a single transaction to explain a broader unraveling, but Indiana's problems included offensive stagnation, Hibbert's decline, and pressure across the roster. The deal failed to fix those issues and may have added strain, yet it was not powerful enough by itself to determine the conference finals outcome.

Final Verdict

The Pacers won narrowly, not because Turner succeeded, but because Allen supplied the only sustained on-court value generated by the transaction. Philadelphia's cap and draft logic was understandable, though the second-round pick never became an NBA piece and Granger was bought out immediately. Indiana B, Philadelphia C-plus, Slight Pacers Edge reflects a trade that disappointed both fan bases without being perfectly equal.

Research sources (5)