NBA Trade Verdict

Knicks Win

New York Knicks captured the stronger long-term value in the 1994-10-13 transaction; Los Angeles Lakers' return of 1997 second-round pick (#53-Paul Rogers); 1998 second-round pick (protected) (not exercised) did not match Doug Christie.

October 13, 1994 Los Angeles Lakers / New York Knicks Record confidence: Medium

Los Angeles Lakers Received

  • Draft Pick 1997 second-round pick (#53- Paul Rogers )
  • Draft Pick 1998 second-round pick (protected) (not exercised)

Trade Analysis

New York Bought a Young Doug Christie for Two Seconds

The Lakers sent Doug Christie to New York before the 1994-95 season for a 1997 second-round pick and a protected 1998 second that ultimately was not exercised. Christie was still only two seasons removed from being a first-round pick, so the Knicks were buying a young NBA wing at a price that contained no first-round capital and no established rotation player.

Christie’s Knicks Tenure Was Short but the Asset Was Real

Christie did not become the long-term Knicks star his later career might suggest. Injuries and a crowded New York rotation limited his direct impact, and the Knicks eventually moved him again. Even so, New York received an actual young NBA player with enough value to stay in the league and become a high-level defender elsewhere. That is more realized asset value than Los Angeles produced from the return package.

The Lakers’ Draft Return Never Developed

The 1997 second-round pick landed at No. 53 and became Paul Rogers, who did not establish an NBA career. The protected 1998 second was never exercised, leaving Los Angeles with no meaningful on-court return from either component. The Knicks did not maximize Christie, but the comparison is still tilted by how little the Lakers ultimately received.

The Second Protected Pick Never Produced a Player

Los Angeles didn't obtain two future NBA contributors in exchange for Doug Christie. One incoming second-round pick ultimately conveyed in 1997 at No. 53 and was associated with Paul Rogers. The other was protected and was not exercised, so it cannot be counted as a second completed draft selection or an additional basketball return. New York received Christie, whose eventual NBA career was far more substantial than the Lakers' draft haul, though much of his best work came after he left the Knicks. That later success helps explain the player's underlying value, but it is not all New York's direct team benefit. The D grade on Los Angeles reflects two low-value draft outcomes after moving a legitimate NBA wing. The Knicks' B reflects acquiring the superior player while acknowledging that their own long-term realized return was more limited than Christie's entire career.

Final Verdict

Knicks Win — New York B, Los Angeles D. Doug Christie’s New York stay was abbreviated, so this is not an A-level win for the Knicks. The Lakers nevertheless received almost nothing from two second-round components: Paul Rogers did not become an NBA contributor and the protected 1998 pick was not exercised. New York acquired the only meaningful player asset in the transaction and therefore wins the completed-value comparison.

Research sources (6)