The Deal in Completed-Value Terms
New Orleans received Casey Jacobsen, Maciej Lampe and Jackson Vroman. Phoenix received Jim Jackson and a 2005 second-round pick that became Marcin Gortat. Those are the directly tied pieces that matter for this retrospective grade; the evaluation does not need hypothetical value from assets the franchises never realized.
Why Phoenix Suns Hold the Better Side
Phoenix received the more useful completed return, led by the pick that became Marcin Gortat. The available evidence supports a Suns win while keeping the margin below a historic blowout. That evidence is more important than simply counting how many names changed hands, because the grade is meant to measure franchise value actually created by the transaction.
The Case for New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans still obtained legitimate player value from Casey Jacobsen and added two other young players. That is enough to keep the return from being treated as empty. Giving the other side full credit for those benefits keeps the verdict proportional instead of turning a clear edge into an exaggerated one.
Why the Grades Land at D+ and B
The D+/B split reflects a meaningful realized difference. Phoenix's side produced the strongest asset, while the New Orleans package did not create comparable long-term value. The letter grades therefore track both the quality of the return and the scale of the gap between the two teams, not just which side technically won.
Final Verdict
Suns Win. New Orleans Pelicans receive D+, while Phoenix Suns receive B. The D+/B split reflects a meaningful realized difference. Phoenix's side produced the strongest asset, while the New Orleans package did not create comparable long-term value. The available evidence notes moderate confidence around remaining historical transaction detail. The verdict should stay grounded in the directly tied player and draft outcomes rather than overstate peripheral mechanics.