Trade 1
April 25, 1994
Los Angeles Chargers received 1994 5th round pick (137th overall, Aaron Laing).
NFL Trade History
TradeVerdicts connects Aaron Laing to 2 exact public NFL transactions involving Los Angeles Chargers, New England Patriots, Green Bay Packers, and Los Angeles Rams.
Player Transaction Context
This profile follows Aaron Laing across 2 recorded transactions from April 25, 1994 through August 13, 1999. Each connection below comes from the database relationship for that transaction rather than a name-only search.
Trade 1
Los Angeles Chargers received 1994 5th round pick (137th overall, Aaron Laing).
Trade 2
Green Bay Packers received Aaron Laing.
Across this profile, the recorded verdicts are Los Angeles Chargers Win; Green Bay Packers Win. The timeline spans 1994–1999 and 4 represented teams.
How to Read This Profile
Every transaction below comes from an explicit player-to-trade relationship in the TradeVerdicts database. Name-only substring matching is not used.
The cards summarize the date, teams, assets, grades, and verdict. Open the full trade page for the complete analysis and sourcing context. Grading standards are explained in the TradeVerdicts methodology.
Chronological Timeline
Trade 1 of 2
Los Angeles Chargers received 1994 3rd round pick (70th overall, Andre Coleman) and 1994 5th round pick (137th overall, Aaron Laing). Andre Coleman became the most durable direct Chargers return and provided several seasons of useful value, while Aaron Laing did not materially change the outcome. Compared with New England Patriots' return, the result supports a B+ grade and fits the Los Angeles Chargers Win verdict.
Trade 2 of 2
On 1999-08-13, Green Bay Packers received Aaron Laing, while Los Angeles Rams received undisclosed draft pick. The hindsight verdict is Green Bay Packers Win, with Green Bay Packers graded C+ and Los Angeles Rams graded C. The evaluation follows the documented consideration and the football value that can be traced from it, while treating conditional terms and later draft outcomes as context rather than as assets exchanged directly on trade day.