Player Trade Profile
Lewis Cine
Explore every recorded NFL trade involving Lewis Cine,
including the assets exchanged, team grades, final verdicts,
and TradeVerdicts analysis.
Trade Impact Summary
The TradeVerdicts database links Lewis Cine to 2 public trade records involving Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings, and Los Angeles Rams.
Each record below shows what the teams received, how each side
was graded, and the analysis behind the verdict. Grades and
verdicts follow the
TradeVerdicts methodology
.
Transaction Record
Related Trades
2 records Detroit Lions Win
Tier: major
Confidence: high
Minnesota Vikings acquired 2022 1st round pick (32nd overall, Lewis Cine), 2022 2nd round pick (34th overall subsequently traded, Christian Watson) and 2022 3rd round pick (66th overall, Brian Asamoah) from Detroit Lions for 2022 1st round pick (12th overall, Jameson Williams) and 2022 2nd round pick (46th overall, Josh Paschal). The overall result favors Detroit Lions over Minnesota Vikings.
Assets Received
- Pick 2022 1st round pick (32nd overall, Lewis Cine), 2022 2nd round pick (34th overall subsequently traded, Christian Watson) and 2022 3rd round pick (66th overall, Brian Asamoah)
- Pick 2022 1st round pick (12th overall, Jameson Williams)
- Pick 2022 2nd round pick (46th overall, Josh Paschal)
Trade Analysis
The grade spread supports Detroit Lions: that side earned the higher mark because it produced the clearer recorded football value.
View the full trade verdict
→ Detroit Lions Win
Tier: major
Confidence: high
The Matthew Stafford-Jared Goff trade is one of the rare NFL blockbusters where both teams can claim victory. The Rams got a Super Bowl quarterback. The Lions got Jared Goff, major draft value, and the foundation for a new competitive era. Los Angeles won the immediate bet, while Detroit won the broader reset. It stands out because the Rams got the championship payoff and the Lions still turned the return into lasting roster value.
Assets Received
- Pick Jared Goff, 2021 3rd round pick (101st overall, Ifeatu Melifonwu), 2022 1st round pick (32nd overall subsequently traded, Lewis Cine) and 2023 1st round pick (6th overall subsequently traded, Paris Johnson)
Trade Analysis
Why the Rams Made the Trade
Los Angeles believed it had a championship roster that needed a quarterback upgrade. Matthew Stafford gave the Rams more arm talent, more late-game confidence, and a better chance to maximize Sean McVay's offense immediately.
The Rams were not trying to win a slow rebuild. They were trying to win right away. That makes the price easier to understand. When a team believes its roster is already good enough to contend, paying future value for the right quarterback can be rational.
What Detroit Actually Received
Detroit received Jared Goff, a third-round pick, and two first-round picks. That package gave the Lions both a bridge and a rebuild path. Goff eventually became more than a placeholder, which changed the entire evaluation.
The draft capital mattered because Detroit needed more than a quarterback swap. The Lions needed a new foundation. The deal gave them assets, time, and flexibility. Instead of starting over with no plan, Detroit created a structure for a broader reset.
Why Both Teams Can Claim Victory
The Rams won the short-term bet because Stafford helped deliver a Super Bowl. That is the cleanest possible validation for an aggressive win-now trade. A banner changes the math. Even a steep price can be justified when the end result is a championship.
Detroit won the long-term roster-building side because the return helped create a stronger foundation. Goff revived his career, the Lions built a more complete roster, and the trade became a turning point for the franchise.
How the Trade Changed Detroit
The Lions used the deal as part of a broader reset. Goff gave them stability, the draft capital helped reshape the roster, and Detroit moved from long-running frustration to legitimate contention.
That part is essential. This was not only about Stafford leaving. It was about Detroit finally converting a star quarterback's value into a sustainable plan. The Lions did not collapse after trading him. They became more balanced.
The Long-Term Legacy
This trade belongs in the rare category of true mutual success. The Rams got a banner. The Lions got a new era. The slight edge goes to Detroit because the deal produced more sustained franchise value.
For Los Angeles, the trade was a championship strike. For Detroit, it was a franchise reset that kept paying off beyond one season.
Why This Trade Still Matters
This trade still matters because it is one of the cleanest examples of two teams solving different problems at the same time. The Rams needed one more high-end quarterback push. The Lions needed a broader roster reset. Both teams acted according to their timelines, and both sides can point to real results.
That is rare. Most blockbusters become obvious wins or obvious mistakes. This one became more interesting because the Rams won the Super Bowl and Detroit still built something sustainable. The edge goes to the Lions, but the Rams also got what they paid for.
Final Verdict
Los Angeles achieved its immediate goal, but Detroit turned the trade into a wider organizational transformation. Lions grade: A+. Rams grade: A.
View the full trade verdict
→ 