Player Trade Profile
Sheldon Richardson
Explore every recorded NFL trade involving Sheldon Richardson,
including the assets exchanged, team grades, final verdicts,
and TradeVerdicts analysis.
Trade Impact Summary
The TradeVerdicts database links Sheldon Richardson to 2 public trade records involving New York Jets, Seattle Seahawks, and Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
Each record below shows what the teams received, how each side
was graded, and the analysis behind the verdict. Grades and
verdicts follow the
TradeVerdicts methodology
.
Transaction Record
Related Trades
2 records New York Jets Win
Tier: minor
Confidence: high
Seattle acquired Sheldon Richardson and a seventh-round pick, while New York received Jermaine Kearse, a second-round pick path, and a seventh-round pick path. The Jets kept the slightly stronger value side.
Assets Received
- Player Sheldon Richardson
- Pick 2018 7th round pick (226th overall subsequently traded, David Williams)
- Player Jermaine Kearse
- Pick 2018 2nd round pick (49th overall subsequently traded, Dallas Goedert)
- Pick 2018 7th round pick (235th overall subsequently traded, Zaire Franklin)
Trade Analysis
New York holds the edge because the Kearse-plus-picks return carried more lasting value than Seattle's short-term Sheldon Richardson move.
View the full trade verdict
→ New York Jets Win
Tier: landmark
Confidence: high
The Jets traded Darrelle Revis to Tampa Bay for the No. 13 pick in the 2013 draft and later pick value, turning an injured star cornerback with contract tension into Sheldon Richardson. Revis still made a Pro Bowl with the Buccaneers, but Tampa Bay went nowhere and moved on after one season. New York got the stronger asset result and avoided the contract trap.
Assets Received
- Pick 2013 1st round pick (13th overall
- Player Sheldon Richardson)
- Pick Draft-pick compensation
- Pick 2013 1st round pick (13th overall, Sheldon Richardson)
- Pick 2014 4th round pick (104th overall, Jalen Saunders)
Trade Analysis
Why the Buccaneers Made the Trade
Tampa Bay made this move because Darrelle Revis was one of the biggest defensive names in football. Even coming off injury, Revis represented rare cornerback value. A true shutdown corner can change the way a defense plays, and the Buccaneers wanted that kind of star power.
That mattered because Tampa Bay was trying to accelerate. The Buccaneers were not trading for a developmental piece. They were buying a proven elite player and betting that Revis would return to form quickly enough to justify the picks and the contract.
What New York Actually Received
New York received the No. 13 pick in the 2013 draft and later pick value. The first-rounder became Sheldon Richardson, who gave the Jets immediate defensive impact and won Defensive Rookie of the Year.
That is why the Jets win the hindsight argument. They moved a great player at a difficult moment, avoided a massive long-term commitment, and still landed a premium defensive lineman. Richardson did not become a decade-long franchise icon, but his early impact gave New York real value.
Why the Trade Still Favors New York
The trade still favors New York because Tampa Bay did not get the sustained Revis era it needed. Revis made the Pro Bowl with the Buccaneers, so this was not a player-quality miss. The problem was the full transaction.
Tampa Bay paid major draft value, took on the financial weight, won only four games, and moved on after one season. That is too much cost for too little team payoff. New York got the cleaner asset result.
The Contract Factor
This trade was always about more than the pick. Revis was coming off injury and wanted to be paid like the elite corner he had been. Tampa Bay accepted both the medical risk and the contract risk.
The Jets avoided that combination. New York did lose a franchise-level corner, but it also avoided being trapped by a giant commitment during a roster reset. That made the trade easier to defend as the results came in.
The Long-Term Legacy
Tampa Bay can argue that Revis himself was not washed. That is true. He remained a quality player and later added more to his career elsewhere. But the Buccaneers did not get the benefit that justifies this kind of trade.
New York's side aged better because the Jets controlled the value. They turned a difficult star-player situation into a top-15 pick and got a productive young defender. That is a successful outcome for a team choosing not to pay.
Why This Trade Still Matters
This trade still matters because it shows the difference between acquiring a great player and winning a great trade. Tampa Bay got the name, but the team context and contract reality made the move fail.
It also belongs in the GSC priority group because the Revis-to-Buccaneers trade is a clean star-player search query. It connects injury risk, contract pressure, first-round pick value, and a one-year team result.
Final Verdict
This should not be graded as a soft Jets lean. New York won the value, contract, and timeline arguments. Jets grade: A-. Buccaneers grade: D.
View the full trade verdict
→ 