Cleveland received 2025 5th round pick (144th overall,…
Cleveland received 2025 5th round pick (144th overall, Shedeur Sanders), while Seattle received 2025 5th round pick (166th overall, Tory Horton), 2025 6th round pick (192nd overall, Bryce Cabeldue). The hindsight grades are C for Cleveland and C for Seattle. The Even Trade verdict is grounded in the actual starts, production, tenure and downstream draft results produced by those assets.
Cleveland Browns Received
- pick 2025 5th round pick (144th overall, Shedeur Sanders )
Seattle Seahawks Received
- pick 2025 5th round pick (166th overall, Tory Horton )
- pick 2025 6th round pick (192nd overall, Bryce Cabeldue )
Trade Analysis
The Exchange
On 2025-04-26, Cleveland received 2025 5th round pick (144th overall, Shedeur Sanders), while Seattle received 2025 5th round pick (166th overall, Tory Horton), 2025 6th round pick (192nd overall, Bryce Cabeldue). Hindsight is unusually useful here because the acquired assets now have a concrete NFL record. The grades can therefore be tied to what those players and picks actually produced for their new teams.
Cleveland Browns Return
Cleveland used No. 144 on Shedeur Sanders. As a 2025 rookie he appeared in eight games and started seven, completing 120 of 212 passes for 1,400 yards, seven touchdowns and 10 interceptions while adding 169 rushing yards and one touchdown. His 68.1 passer rating makes the return meaningful but still unsettled after one season. Those results are the basis for Cleveland's C grade.
Seattle Seahawks Return
Seattle drafted Tory Horton and Bryce Cabeldue. Horton immediately produced 13 catches for 161 yards and five touchdowns in eight games, plus a 95-yard punt-return touchdown. Cabeldue appeared in eight games without a start before Seattle waived him in September 2026 and Las Vegas claimed him. Horton is already the stronger piece of Seattle's return. That record supports Seattle's C grade.
Value in Hindsight
The trade is best understood through those specific outcomes. The meaningful comparison is the actual games, starts, statistics, longevity and downstream draft use created by each side's return. A pick that was moved again is credited through the supported transaction chain, not by pretending the original team drafted a player it never selected.
Final Verdict
The verdict is Even Trade. Both teams receive C because the documented football returns remain meaningful but unsettled, rather than because of assumptions about draft capital alone. Each side is credited for what its acquired assets actually delivered, and the result is judged on that team-specific production.