Philadelphia sent picks 115 and 185 to Green Bay for pick…

Why the Trade Happened

Philadelphia sent picks 115 and 185 to Green Bay for pick 109, then selected wide receiver Jason Avant. The Packers used the incoming choices on Will Blackmon and Tyrone Culver. At the time, each club had a practical roster reason for acting, and the price was small enough or targeted enough to make the exchange understandable before the later results were known.

What the Returns Produced

Avant became a dependable Eagles slot receiver and special-teams contributor, staying in Philadelphia for eight seasons and providing far more sustained offensive value than a typical fourth-round selection. Blackmon supplied useful return ability and defensive depth for Green Bay, while Culver offered comparatively limited Packers value before continuing his career elsewhere. Looking only at the names exchanged on the transaction date misses part of the story, because actual playing time, role, longevity and any later use of draft capital determine how much football value each side ultimately created.

How the Value Developed

Green Bay did receive useful play from Blackmon, but Avant's longevity and consistent role made the single player Philadelphia targeted the best return in the exchange. The longer view matters most here: a short burst of production can still justify a modest acquisition cost, while a draft choice can become more valuable when it is converted into a durable starter or additional selections.

Why This Trade Still Matters

This deal is a useful reminder that trade value should follow the complete return rather than stop at the first transaction line. Later pick movement, roster tenure and meaningful postseason or starting contributions all belong in the comparison. That approach gives both teams credit for what their assets actually became instead of grading only the original labels.

Final Verdict

Philadelphia Eagles Win is the best fit. Green Bay Packers earns a C+, while Philadelphia Eagles earns a B+. Those marks account for the cost paid, the direct production received, the length of each contribution and any important downstream draft value. The gap is intentionally narrow when both sides found useful returns and wider when one club received little lasting football value.