Cincinnati Bengals and Los Angeles Raiders completed this…
Cincinnati Bengals and Los Angeles Raiders completed this exchange on 1993-07-16. Dixon appeared in only two regular-season games for the Raiders in 1993 before knee trouble interrupted his season. There is little reason to force a winner. Following the acquired picks only through moves actually made by the receiving clubs, the overall result is Even Trade.
Cincinnati Bengals Received
- pick 1994 sixth round pick (#184-Jerry Reynolds)
Las Vegas Raiders Received
- player Rickey Dixon
Trade Analysis
Why the Deal Happened
Cincinnati sent defensive back Rickey Dixon to the Raiders in July 1993 for a future draft choice that later became the 184th pick in the 1994 draft. The Bengals were moving on from a former first-rounder who had seen little recent action, while Los Angeles paid only a sixth-round selection for a veteran secondary option. The modest cost on both sides limited the potential downside from the start.
What Cincinnati Bengals and Los Angeles Raiders Received
Dixon appeared in only two regular-season games for the Raiders in 1993 before knee trouble interrupted his season. Cincinnati used the acquired sixth-round pick on offensive lineman Jerry Reynolds. Reynolds did not play a regular-season game for the Bengals and later logged 25 games with the Giants, including only two starts. In team-specific terms, neither club converted its side into a durable contributor.
How the Value Developed
There is little reason to force a winner. The Raiders received a tiny amount of immediate playing time from Dixon, while the Bengals received a draft asset but no Cincinnati regular-season production from the player selected with it. Because the cost was low and the realized team value was similarly limited, matching below-average grades fit the outcome better than crediting one side for a career that mostly happened elsewhere.
Final Verdict
Even Trade. Cincinnati Bengals receives a D+ and Los Angeles Raiders receives a D+. The grading credits direct on-field production and follows an acquired draft choice into a later trade only when that same asset was actually controlled and moved by the receiving club. That approach avoids assigning another team's eventual selection to the wrong side and keeps the verdict tied to value each franchise truly realized.