San Diego acquired linebacker Tim Rossovich from Philadelphia…
San Diego acquired linebacker Tim Rossovich from Philadelphia in 1972 for its 1973 first-round pick. Philadelphia ultimately used the No. 6 selection on USC tight end Charle Young, who became an immediate Pro Bowl player and a major piece of the Eagles’ offense for several seasons.
Los Angeles Chargers Received
- player Tim Rossovich
Philadelphia Eagles Received
- pick 1973 first round pick (#6-Charle Young)
Trade Analysis
What the Trade Actually Did
San Diego acquired linebacker Tim Rossovich from Philadelphia in 1972 for its 1973 first-round pick. Philadelphia ultimately used the No. 6 selection on USC tight end Charle Young, who became an immediate Pro Bowl player and a major piece of the Eagles’ offense for several seasons.
Why the Deal Made Sense
The price was unmistakably premium: San Diego’s 1973 first-round choice. That made Rossovich an expensive veteran acquisition from the moment the deal was completed. Rossovich was productive enough to start and lead the Chargers in tackles in 1973, so San Diego did receive real on-field value. The trade was not a case of giving away a first-rounder for nothing.
What the Return Became
Philadelphia used the pick on Charle Young, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie and became one of the league’s better receiving tight ends. That realized result makes the draft asset particularly valuable.
Why the Value Separated
The Eagles win because they turned a veteran defender into a high selection that produced a young impact starter. San Diego’s usable two-year return prevents the lowest grade, but it did not match the value surrendered.
Final Verdict
Philadelphia Eagles Win. The final grades reflect realized production, longevity, acquisition cost and the value of the draft capital that changed hands. Los Angeles Chargers receives C and Philadelphia Eagles receives A-.
How the Hindsight Standard Applies
This verdict does not assume that every draft choice should have produced a star. It compares what each club surrendered with the actual careers, roster roles and flexibility created by the exchange. That keeps the judgment centered on historical value rather than reputation alone.