Baltimore traded linebacker Bob Grant to Washington in July…
Baltimore traded linebacker Bob Grant to Washington in July 1971 and received Washington’s second- and seventh-round selections in the 1972 draft. The Colts used those picks on wide receiver Glenn Doughty at No. 47 and defensive end John Sykes at No. 169. The historical result remains meaningful when measured against the cost and the careers that followed.
Indianapolis Colts Received
- pick 1972 second round pick (#47-Glenn Doughty)
- pick 1972 seventh round pick (#169-John Sykes)
Washington Commanders Received
- player Bob Grant
Trade Analysis
What the Trade Actually Did
Baltimore traded linebacker Bob Grant to Washington in July 1971 and received Washington’s second- and seventh-round selections in the 1972 draft. The Colts used those picks on wide receiver Glenn Doughty at No. 47 and defensive end John Sykes at No. 169.
Why the Deal Made Sense
This deal fits the broader contrast between Allen’s veteran-focused Washington strategy and Baltimore’s willingness to take future draft capital. Grant gave Washington an experienced defender but did not become a long-term franchise cornerstone. His value was primarily immediate roster help.
What the Return Became
Baltimore received two selections and found useful production in Doughty, giving the Colts more years of controllable value from the exchange. Sykes added another opportunity from the seventh round.
Why the Value Separated
The Colts earn the edge because the pick package generated more sustained value than Grant’s Washington tenure. The cost was not catastrophic for Washington, but the long-term return clearly favored Baltimore.
Final Verdict
Indianapolis Colts Win. The final grades reflect realized production, longevity, acquisition cost and the value of the draft capital that changed hands. Indianapolis Colts receives A- and Washington Commanders receives C.
How the Hindsight Standard Applies
This verdict does not assume that every draft choice should have produced a star. It compares what each club surrendered with the actual careers, roster roles and flexibility created by the exchange. That keeps the judgment centered on historical value rather than reputation alone. The timing of the deal also matters because each club was operating with different roster needs and competitive horizons. That context helps explain the decision without changing the hindsight result.